The one intriguing
truism about the bible is that the story about our past is the story about our
present and will be the story about our future.
In many ways, it’s a classic case of “those
who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” And repeat it we do as human beings on planet
earth.
In Wes Howard-Brook's book Unveiling Empire, it is put best, “In the Bible there is really only one
story: that of a people struggling to
leave empire behind and set out to follow God.” Or when Bono sings so eloquently in U2’s song
40, “I will sing, sing a new song,” he’s telling God of his desire to
live in the New Jerusalem.
You know
what’s interesting about that song? U2
will play it as the last song of their concert, but only if they feel “God is in the house.” I guess the same can be said about John who
wrote Revelation. If God’s “in the house” the New Jerusalem is
alive and well. If not, welcome to
Babylon.
In Revelation, John is writing
about the contrasting realities of Babylon and the New Jerusalem as experienced
at the time of the Roman Empire. For
John, the veil of imperial propaganda is lifted and he sees the “Roman Empire was ‘really’ Babylon.” Babylon’s myriad of evil ways are the status
quo in the Empire of Rome (murder, whoring, illusion, sorcery, worship of
idols, etc.), but Babylon could just as easily be the Empires of Egypt or
Assyria or Greece or even Jerusalem trying to live into Empire in the ancient
world or Israel today, or the British Empire at its height of power or United
States today.
“Babylon stands in diametric contrast to the
ways of God. “ In other words, Babylon is an empire of
humanity and New Jerusalem is God's empire. When John talks about the fall of Babylon,
he’s not talking about a future event (although Rome does fall
eventually). He’s talking about the fall
as then or now.
In Unveiling Empire, “Babylon exists wherever human society becomes empire, asserting its
power over creation and usurping the privileges of God. New Jerusalem is found wherever human
community resists the ways of empire and places God at the center of its shared
live.”
All of this gives
context to the meaning of the "fall of Babylon"
in Revelation 17-18 and especially the often-times misunderstood term “the end of the world.” As I understand it, the "fall of Babylon" and
“the end of the world” are whenever we walk away from empire and toward the New
Jerusalem. “Come out!” John uses these words as encouragement to his people, but also as warning to members of the early
Christian Church (or ekklesiai). The
same warning still rings true for Church today.
How many of our parishioners
worship the idol of the almighty U.S. dollar and give little back to the poor
and marginalized in their communities?
How many of our parishioners believe the illusion that America is the
police force of the world? How many of our
parishioners are supporters of the death penalty, but vehemently against abortion? Or against government
spending for the poorest of the poor? The
New Jerusalem calls us to “come out” of Empire and help build the Kingdom of
God here and now.
The "fall of Babylon"
repeats itself over and over again. If
we chose to live apart from an empire reality that is all about profit or
status or wealth, if we embrace what it means to be a member of the New
Jerusalem as “Church,” our wealth is truly in heaven, our status is that of
disciple of Jesus Christ and our profit is seeing to the needs of the poorest
and most marginalized in our world. When
I think of those who lived the New Jerusalem, I think of Mother Teresa or St.
Francis of Assisi. They gave up
everything Babylon has to offer to serve the Kingdom. And John’s Revelation is asking us to do the
same and enter the New Jerusalem.
The most memorable
thing said about the difference between Babylon and New Jerusalem is that “Babylon is the best that money can buy while
New Jerusalem is what God gives away for free.
Is life the best that money can buy or is life a gift?” Powerful food for thought and a powerful,
life-giving way to exist as Church today or any day in the New Jerusalem.
No comments:
Post a Comment