Here's the pre-Conclave profile of our new Holy Father, Pope Francis (Jorge Bergoglio S.J.) by National Catholic Reporter correspondent John L. Allen Jr.
By that measure alone, Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio of Buenos Aires,
Argentina, at least merits a look.
After the dust settled from the election of Benedict XVI, various reports
identified the Argentine Jesuit as the main challenger to then-Cardinal Joseph
Ratzinger. One cardinal later said the conclave had been "something of a horse
race" between Ratzinger and Bergoglio, and an anonymous conclave diary splashed
across the Italian media in September 2005 claimed that Bergoglio received 40
votes on the third ballot, just before Ratzinger crossed the two-thirds
threshold and became pope.
Though it's hard to say how seriously one should take the specifics, the
general consensus is that Bergoglio was indeed the "runner-up" last time around.
He appealed to conservatives in the College of Cardinals as a man who had held
the line against liberalizing currents among the Jesuits, and to moderates as a
symbol of the church's commitment to the developing world.
Bergoglio's reputation for personal simplicity also exercised an undeniable
appeal – a Prince of the Church who chose to live in a simple apartment rather
than the archbishop's palace, who gave up his chauffeured limousine in favor of
taking the bus to work, and who cooked his own meals.
Another measure of Bergoglio's seriousness as a candidate was the negative
campaigning that swirled around him eight years ago.
Three days before the 2005 conclave, a human rights lawyer in Argentina filed
a complaint charging Bergoglio with complicity in the 1976 kidnapping of two
liberal Jesuit priests under the country's military regime, a charge Bergoglio
flatly denied. There was also an e-mail campaign, claiming to originate with
fellow Jesuits who knew Bergoglio when he was the provincial of the order in
Argentina, asserting that "he never smiled."
All of that by way of saying, Bergoglio was definitely on the radar screen.
Of course he's eight years older now, and at 76 is probably outside the age
window many cardinals would see as ideal. Further, the fact he couldn't get over
the hump last time may convince some cardinals there's no point going back to
That said, many of the reasons that led members of the college to take him
seriously eight years ago are still in place.
Born in Buenos Aires in 1936, Bergoglio's father was an Italian immigrant and
railway worker from the region around Turin, and he has four brothers and
sisters. His original plan was to be a chemist, but in 1958 he instead entered
the Society of Jesus and began studies for the priesthood. He spent much of his
early career teaching literature, psychology and philosophy, and early on he was
seen as a rising star. From 1973 to 1979 he served as the Jesuit provincial in
Argentina, then in 1980 became the rector of the seminary from which he had
Although Jesuits generally are discouraged from receiving ecclesiastical
honors and advancement, especially outside mission countries, Bergoglio was
named auxiliary bishop of Buenos Aires in 1992 and then succeeded the ailing
Cardinal Antonio Quarracino in 1998. John Paul II made Bergoglio a cardinal in
2001, assigning him the Roman church named after the legendary Jesuit St. Robert
Over the years, Bergoglio became close to the Comunione e
Liberazione movement founded by Italian Fr. Luigi Giussani, sometimes
speaking at its massive annual gathering in Rimini, Italy. He's also presented
Giussani's books at literary fairs in Argentina. This occasionally generated
consternation within the Jesuits, since the ciellini once upon a time
were seen as the main opposition to Bergoglio's fellow Jesuit in Milan, Cardinal
Carlo Maria Martini.
On the other hand, that's also part of Bergoglio's appeal, someone who
personally straddles the divide between the Jesuits and the ciellini,
and more broadly, between liberals and conservatives in the church.
Bergoglio has supported the social justice ethos of Latin American
Catholicism, including a robust defense of the poor.
"We live in the most unequal part of the world, which has grown the most yet
reduced misery the least," Bergoglio said during a gathering of Latin American
bishops in 2007. "The unjust distribution of goods persists, creating a
situation of social sin that cries out to Heaven and limits the possibilities of
a fuller life for so many of our brothers."
At the same time, he has generally tended to accent growth in personal
holiness over efforts for structural reform.
Bergoglio is seen an unwaveringly orthodox on matters of sexual morality,
staunchly opposing abortion, same-sex marriage, and contraception. In 2010 he
asserted that gay adoption is a form of discrimination against children, earning
a public rebuke from Argentina's President, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner.
Nevertheless, he has shown deep compassion for the victims of HIV-AIDS; in
2001, he visited a hospice to kiss and wash the feet of 12 AIDS patients.
Bergoglio also won high marks for his compassionate response to the 1994
bombing in Buenos Aires of a seven-story building housing the Argentine Jewish
Mutual Association and the Delegation of the Argentine Jewish Association. It
was one of the worst anti-Jewish attacks ever in Latin America, and in 2005
Rabbi Joseph Ehrenkranz of the Center for Christian-Jewish Understanding at
Sacred Heart University in Fairfield, Connecticut, praised Bergoglio's
"He was very concerned with what happened, Ehrenkranz said. "He's got
Nevertheless, after the conclave of 2005 some cardinals candidly admitted to
doubts that Bergoglio really had the steel and "fire in the belly" needed to
lead the universal church. Moreover, for most of the non-Latin Americans,
Bergoglio was an unknown quantity. A handful remembered his leadership in the
2001 Synod of Bishops, when Bergoglio replaced Cardinal Edward Egan of New York
as the relator, or chairman, of the meeting after Egan went home to
help New Yorkers cope with the 9/11 terrorist attacks. In that setting,
Bergoglio left a basically positive but indistinct impression.
Bergoglio may be basically conservative on many issues, but he's no defender
of clerical privilege, or insensitive to pastoral realities. In September 2012,
he delivered a blistering attack on priests who refuse to baptize children born
out of wedlock, calling it a form of "rigorous and hypocritical
The case for Bergoglio in 2013 rests on four points.
First and most basically, he had strong support last time around, and some
cardinals may think that they're getting another bite at the apple now.
Second, Bergoglio is a candidates who brings together the first world and the
developing world in his own person. He's a Latin American with Italian roots,
who studied in Germany. As a Jesuit he's a member of a truly international
religious community, and his ties to Comunione e Liberazione make him
part of another global network.
Third, Bergoglio still has appeal across the usual divides in the church,
drawing respect from both conservatives and moderates for his keen pastoral
sense, his intelligence, and his personal modesty. He's also seen as a genuinely
spiritual soul, and a man of deep prayer.
"Only someone who has encountered mercy, who has been caressed by the
tenderness of mercy, is happy and comfortable with the Lord," Bergoglio said in
2001. "I beg the theologians who are present not to turn me in to the
Sant'Uffizio or the Inquisition; however, forcing things a bit, I dare to say
that the privileged locus of the encounter is the caress of the mercy of Jesus
Christ on my sin."
Fourth, he's also seen as a successful evangelist.
"We have to avoid the spiritual sickness of a self-referential church,"
Bergoglio said recently. "It's true that when you get out into the street, as
happens to every man and woman, there can be accidents. However, if the church
remains closed in on itself, self-referential, it gets old. Between a church
that suffers accidents in the street, and a church that's sick because it's
self-referential, I have no doubts about preferring the former."
On the other hand, there are compelling reasons to believe that Bergoglio's
window of opportunity to be pope has already closed.
First, he's eight years older than in 2005, and at 76 he would only be two
years younger than Benedict XVI was when he became pope. Especially on the heels
of a papal resignation on the basis of age and exhaustion, many cardinals may
balk at electing someone that old, fearing it would set the church up for
another shock to the system.
Second, although Bergoglio was a serious contender in 2005, he couldn't
attract sufficient support to get past the two-thirds threshold needed to be
elected pope. Especially for the 50 cardinals who were inside the conclave eight
years ago, they may be skeptical that the results would be any different this
Third, the doubts that circulated about Bergoglio's toughness eight years ago
may arguably be even more damaging now, given that the ability to govern. and to
take control of the Vatican bureaucracy, seems to figure even more prominently
on many cardinals' wish lists this time. Although Bergoglio is a member of
several Vatican departments, including the Congregations for Divine Worship and
for Clergy, he's never actually worked inside the Vatican, and there may be
concerns about his capacity to take the place in hand.
Fourth, there's the standard ambivalence about Jesuits in high office, both
from within the order and among some on the outside. That may have been a factor
in slowing Bergoglio's progress last time, and nothing has changed the calculus
in the time since.
Whether Bergoglio catches fire again as a candidate remains to be seen; one
Italian writer quoted an anonymous cardinal on March 2 as saying, "Four years of
Bergoglio would be enough to change things." Given his profile, however,
Bergoglio seems destined to plan an important role in this conclave – if not as
king, then as a kingmaker.
Post a Comment